By Ron Walters | SACOBSERVER.COM WIRE SERVICES
(NNPA) - I noted some time ago that it was
a good thing that the Black masses were gravitating toward
Barack Obama on their own because the leadership was divided.
That division now amounts to confusion and continues even
as he stands poised on the brink of doing something never
done before, a Black person winning the Democratic nomination
for president of the United States. What do I mean by confusion?
First, there is the fact that as a result of Obama’s
sterling performance, some of those Black Superdelegates in
the Democratic party who had committed early to Hillary Clinton
are now moving back to Obama. This reminds me that when Rev.
Jesse Jackson ran for president in 1984, most of the Black
political class was not on his side, but by 1988 they were
all there because in 1984 he had won most of the votes in
their districts and they were afraid to be caught off base
again.
So, Black Superdelegates like John Lewis are said to be
reconsidering their commitment to Hillary, while other members
of the Congressional Black Caucus, for example, are having
conference calls commiserating over the fact that some are
officials of Hillary’s campaign but their districts
voted, or will vote, for Obama. Since Super Tuesday, among
all Superdelegates 25 more have committed to Barack Obama,
while Hillary Clinton has lost five, an indication that even
among Blacks there will be plenty of shifting ahead as he
continues to win in Black districts.
Then, there is the letter that Julian Bond, Chair of the
NAACP sent to the Democratic National Committee suggesting
that not to seat the Florida and Michigan delegates would
result in million of voters in the two states not having their
votes counted, an act that would remind some of recent racially
discriminatory elections, asking Howard Dean, the DNC Chair,
to come up with a resolution of the problem. On that, a counterpoint
letter was launched by Rev. Al Sharpton who is neutral with
respect to the candidates, which objected to seating the delegates,
asking Dean to protect both candidates from charges that the
process was tainted, since it would amount to a change of
the rules in the middle of the game.
In fact, Bond’s letter was interpreted by some observers
as a “pro-Hillary delegate move”, since it was
so late in responding to rules that were enacted by the party
last year that governed both primaries this year. Moreover,
his letter is puzzling, since the greater disfranchisement
would amount to those black voters who abided by the rules
and didn’t vote in Michigan and Florida, but would have
their situation negated by a change of the rules.
The last example among many is the dust-up between Barack
Obama and Tavis Smiley over his appearance at Tavis’
State of Black America event in New Orleans. Tavis was said
to have invited Obama to appear at the event, and Obama wrote
him back to say that he was campaigning but that he would
send Michele Obama, his wife and a good surrogate to represent
him. But Tavis rejected her, wanting to seat only principals.
The result was that while Hillary Clinton came, there was
no representation from the Obama camp.
Hillary had to come because of her low standing with Blacks.
But for all of the excitement that she created by reading
her speech, she could have faxed it to the event and had it
distributed. Even her response to Tavis’ question about
the reputed racist remarks of her husband toward Obama were
addressed in the fashion – the Clinton administration
did a lot of good things for Blacks, so you know that he couldn’t
have meant to be racist.
I’ve thought hard about this and concluded that since
Hillary has a 100 percent name recognition in this campaign
and Obama is still introducing himself to people, he was right
to stay in the field, especially at the most critical time
of the campaign.
The point this makes is that the political confusion among
black leaders in this campaign may eventually prevent effective
bargaining for the things their community needs. And yes,
they may have to bargain even if a Black president wins the
White House.
Dr. Ron Walters is the Distinguished Leadership Scholar,
Director of the African-American Leadership Center and Professor
of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College
Park. His latest book is: Freedom Is Not Enough: Black Voters,
Black Candidates and American Presidential Politics (Rowman
and Littlefield)
|